Notes on substrates for chemical labeling
for substrates that are purchased in dry powder form: dissolve in fresh, water-free DMSO using fresh DMSO from a sealed container is crucial as DMSO is hygroscopic; we observed reduced labeling efficiency when using substrates that were dissolved in old DMSO, presumably due to substrate hydrolysis
Cost of chemical labeling: the prize of 50 nmol of SNAP substrate (sufficient for ~1,000 labeling reactions at 1 µM concentration in a volume of 0.5 ml each) is comparable to that of an 0.5 ml aliquot of fluorophore-coupled secondary antibody (sufficient for ~1,000 immunostainings in a volume of 0.5 ml each). However, we have successfully tested some substrates (e.g. BG-549, Halo-TMR) at 100 nM and lower concentrations (indeed, there might be situations where lower substrate concentrations - combined with longer incubation times - might be desirable). Also, no primary antibodies and blocking reagents are required for chemical labeling. Therefore, the cost of chemical labeling is comparable to, or potentially lower than, the cost of immunostainings.
Recommended substrates
+++ (very good), ++ (decent), + (weak), - (doesn't work)
SNAP
see full list of commercially available substrates here
CLIP
see full list of commercially available substrates here
BC-547 (+++)
BC-488 (++)
BC-647 (+)
Halo
see full list of commercially available substrates here
TMP
see full list of commercially available substrates here